Everything new about the iPhone 13 Pro an AMAZING mobile

When we discuss a new iPhone model the first thing we check is the features. Therefore, we always choose the best one based on the performance, the camera and the accessibility of the model.

In this article we will show you everything about the iPhone 13 Pro and its features.

IPhone 13 Pro design

In the back we see that the glass is the entire surface with interchange of matte and gloss, the last in a camera module that fills in size. The lenses are larger (plus part of the sensors) and the square tile with tight corners has the edge of for all intents and purposes a large part of the width of the back.

Its matte finish, in addition to giving it a touch of elegance, remains clean and is anti-slip. So you won't have to worry about them falling out of your hands.

Additionally, as mentioned above, the reflective parts are more prone to fingerprints, causing thus the edges (again level) and the logo.

The opinions of customers who have used iPhone Pro express

You can also notice the change in the buttons by having placed them in a different place. The SIM board is somewhat higher on a similar side and the base has not changed, with the Lightning port in the center and the speaker and receiver on either side, with similar openings. Additionally, the silent mode button remains, the brand of the house.

This being so, so similar to its archetype, so are measurements and subjection.

The corners calculated at 90 degrees are still much more aesthetic than the tight edges that had remained until the iPhone 11 Pro (from the iPhone 6), however, this design is not difficult to get used to, being a mobile that can almost be used with one hand which reduces the problem of having both hands busy on the cell phone.

In contrast to certain adversaries, and because of having chosen the more modest size, the 13 Pro is more conservative than the Samsung Galaxy S21 and Sony Xperia 5 III, however, Sony's is the lightest of this choice (and with a larger battery than the S21 and iPhone, most likely).

Turning to the numbers, the 13 Pro is totally somewhat bulkier and heavier than the 12 Pro, however, as we said, they are not considerable contrasts.

Description of iPhone 13 Pro front bed

Speaking of the front, here we see another change that is critical from the opinions offered by the inhabitants of Cupertino.

Apple continues to be deeply restrained in the degree to change the style with respect to the screen, and the iPhone X was one of the main leaps in such a way as it left behind exceptionally even edges yet very outdated in the generally entered time of the battle by using the screen.

Moreover, for this situation we do not see that jump, but a "normal" decrease in the size of the indentation.

It is not something as small as the parts of past iPhone models or the border on the screen that they currently released and is normal for the iPhone 13, but it is a more limited and less high border (Result, 20% smaller ).

This implies a little more surface area for the screen and that the symbols on the taskbar can be somewhat longer, however, it is not something too recognizable practically speaking (we will talk about the implication with the next segment).

In short, the iPhone on the subject is a laptop worked with quality materials and all wrapped up, giving the feeling that it is safe and with great sensations of grip and contact, without slipping or getting dirty on most of its surface. Without many changes for the big ones and for the not so big ones.

IPhone 13 Pro display — here's how to exploit what was a decent OLED at the time

The appearance of 120 Hz with ProMotion is the main rarity, consequently changing from having a static load rate of 60 Hz to a load variety between 10 Hz and 120 Hz, as considered by the framework based on performance (and what the application you are using demands).

For the rest, we have a 6.1-inch Retina XDR super- retina motherboard with a 2,532 x 1,170 pixel lenses, which is about 460 pixels per inch. The difference ratio remains at 2,000,000: 1, which is no small achievement, and they supported the splendor of the pinnacle at 1,200 nits.

Making an aseptic examination, regardless of experience, the iPhone will not win in goal or thickness, however, they are values that are above the common FullHD + and are ordinarily in the range of 408 and 420 bulbs.

It is below the densities that reach mobile phones such as the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (515 dpi, 3,200 x 1,440 pixels) or the Sony Xperia of higher quality and out of reach (the Sony Xperia 1 III has a thickness of 643 dpi and a 4K lens), however, the degree of detail is above and at this level the experience is generally excellent.

Screen quality and excellence

One of the perspectives that those of Cupertino generally get right is the adjustment of the plate and for this situation there is no type of failure. The screen is displayed with satisfactory shading, difference and temperature limits, with the True Tone alternative (a timed shift based on conditions), which works admirably.

In the field of screen it resembles its distant cousin the iPad Pro and the standard, seeing that this recurrence is mandatory even in the most aggressive mid-range and that the "main 60 Hz" are left as a rule for the most discreet and traditionalist recommendations.

Is the 120 Hz of the great iPhone 13 Pro Max screen recognizable?

The loading rate of the iPhone 13 Pro screen, similar to that of the iPad Pro, has the ProMotion setting as a sine qua non condition along with 120 Hz, so the rate varies depending on which application we run, so it is not something consistent and in all actuality is anything but an exceptionally infrequent change in the deduced experience, yet something that helps to improve and that in the end you are fully informed as to what is expected of an advantage.

In addition, the ProMotion setting works so that it is the framework that sets the pace and not the applications, so through this advance the power reserve funds can become more noticeable than in other comparative settings where the framework does not take over.

Obviously, in the degree of manual change, iOS does not offer the options that we normally find in different Android devices, so the most extreme is perhaps 90 Hz or some intermediate rate.

What we can do, if you do not want to really decide for higher rates revive, is restricted to 60 Hz that view by going to the menu availability.

Extra experience offered by an Ultra HD screen

The screen offers a correct shading range and an immersion that does not go beyond the standard additional track of an OLED board. with a portion of differentiation that is valued. Touch sensitivity is equally sufficient and generally reacts well to everything.

With iOS 14 came the gadgets and that insignificantly expanded the few (or none) conceivable results to modify the home screen a bit in iOS, however, there have been no progressions, and we cannot choose neither the closet nor the work area., change the fabric, touch up the lock screen, a surrounding screen or the rest of the points of view that are normally presented on Android.

The quality of this device is the best of this mobile

Regarding the quality of the screen, the involvement with training is basically the same as Apple devices have so far. Progression is good when it comes to scratching square millimeters for the screen.

Here maybe some programmed setting should be presented so that full screen games do not have the region under the border or the engineers should do this as such for ease of use, so that the border does not cover the buttons or menus.

Performance: the new processor can handle anything

In this case, the Apple iPhone 13s accompanies the A15 Bionic (five centers GPU versus four centers in the iPhone 13 s not Pro). Apple does not show the RAM, however, the iPhone 13 Pro comes with 6 GB, which would be equivalent to the 12 Pro.

Programming: bet on your own applications

New iPhone, new iOS. The iPhone 13 appears with iOS 15 hand in hand, because the framework finally reaches all customers with versatile campatible devices, and for the moment we have tested the main form of this product.

The connection of apps and layouts is maintained, with a workspace as a place to master apps (Library notwithstanding), Notification Center (pulling the top left down), Control Center (pulling the top directly down) and the gadget exposure (on the left, as would Google Discover on numerous Android phones).

The most impressive of the iPhone 13 Pro Max system

Something that still remains genuinely flawless are the frame settings. The connection is very good, with the exception perhaps of the iCloud section, despite the fact that what remains to a certain extent less deductible is that the explicit settings for each application are in the global ones and that there is still no immediate access from something similar, such as Mail, Camera or notifications and Control Center.

Something positive, which are essentially improving, are the data that the client has of their information and the potential results in terms of security. iOS illuminates and warns very well for each situation, and the proposal to the client is maintained in each application that recognizes or does not follow the equivalent.

iOS resembling Google Lens

Something that also finally came together in iOS is what resembles a Google Lens estimate on the degree of constant text readiness in a photo. We will see that the camera application shows with a small logo that it has identified the text, and by touching it, it chooses it and offers options, such as replicating it or deciphering it.

Fixation modes are another new element. Again it is anything but a novel idea, however, the execution is generally excellent and can be of great help in order to work with said fixing or the reverse, the disconnection, as it is really adjustable and there are no impediments in the applications ( supporting own and others).

iOS 15, on the other hand, shows a practically 100% correct activity, without unexpected terminations and only due to certain bugs that can presumably be fixed in ongoing updates such as coverage components (it started to happen on Instagram however it was fixed) or the disappointment of syncing with Apple Watch for opening. Other than that, it's stable and solid behind the scenes.

Biometrics and security

No, despite reports, the iPhone 13s didn't bring back Touch ID (the fingerprint peripheral that Apple built into the iPhone 5s ), and in fact the gossip has continued on the iPhone 5s. What they do maintain is Face ID , Apple's own 3D facial recognition framework.

Opening is exceptionally fast and the lifting motion to act is your best friend. Of course, the notable that we would put Face ID as such is dominated by what requires the opening to improve in the event that we need an elective technique.

A customer without an Apple Watch must rely on the code in the event that they are wearing a veil or if for unknown reasons they cannot get a glimpse of the laptop, and the conjuring of the code is still exceptionally slow. It would be solved with a basic alternative route of the type "Use code" directly when waking up the screen, especially if the frame does not identify any faces.

Cameras: the proof that it is so useful to bet on larger sensors

Photography has stood out as the main space of progress of the 13 Pro, and on paper there is undoubtedly bringing up to that booth. In terms of equipment, Apple continues to put aside the megapixel war, agitated over the past eighteen months, to move on to another (more) fascinating ziggurat: that of sensor size and adjustment.

Apple professes to have packed the largest sensor to date on its PDAs, and at the Pro's expense, the pixels are 1.9 µm (on the iPhone 12 Pro they were 1.4 µm ). This ensures better performance, especially in low light conditions.

In addition, the openings are equally enlarged both in the wide point and in the main one, and to this is added the optical adjustment of the image by sensor displacement that in the past we could only discover in the Pro Max model, and that in the 13 Pro it has been further merged into its fundamental camera (the Zoom focal point has OIS as standard).

In short, what we find in the 13 Pro in the field of camera is what accompanies:

· Fax: 12 megapixel sensor with f / 2.8 aperture focal length (77 mm) and 3x optical zoom. OIS.

· Primary: 12 megapixel sensor with f / 1.5 aperture focal point and OIS with sensor switch.

· Front camera: 12 megapixel sensor with f / 2.2 aperture focal length.

Night mode debuts on all cameras and there are two notable additional options: full-scale mode and movie mode.

We will see them exhaustively in the photography part (the previous one) and video (especially the last one mentioned). Advantages, and in addition Styles are included, an approach to consolidate them so that it does not remain in a basic channel and that there is a work of calculations behind, as indicated by the brand.

Camera app

Apple has been adding highlights and that, as a rule, has required its symbol or button in the interface, and from the photo mode we have seen the night mode, the live photos or the Styles this time, in addition to other things.

The path through the segments occurs by sliding between fixed tabs, with the typical buttons to jump to each focal point. As no assists we recognize that the SmartHDR cannot be damaged from the settings and as increments we have that new realistic mode, and not the large scale as manual mode.

The large scale mode starts naturally when we approach an element, without having the option to activate or deactivate it.

Styles are added as one of the extra-secret fasteners, like live photography or glow. For the settings, as we referred to in the last segment, we have to go to the general settings, and depending on what we enact there we can see the RAW alternative or set a default video quality, in addition to other things.

How the camera app works inside the iPhone 13 Pro

The application works admirably, and fits well with what the terminal offers, however, there are some potential improvements to the use of the new provisions. For example, the large-scale mode could have some manual application option to get away from "the dance" that happens with the focal difference when we brush as much as possible, so that assuming we need to exploit the normal haze of the primary focal point we can do it discreetly, and also assuming that we need to make a full scale with the wide point.

The Styles could also be denoted something else when they are started, so that photos are not taken inadvertently with one of them activated. Above all, because the styles, as they are not a channel (even remaining in the management of the photo), cannot be deduced eliminated.

Rear cameras of this great mobile

It gives us images with a generally excellent and powerful range and a fair and practical shadow treatment. It seems that the preparation with orange and warm tones that we have experienced the last times is not such and the white balance for the most part hits the target (repeat).

The differentiation is correct and the degree of detail during the day is surprising. The regular bokeh is tight, continuous and charming, making it as truly outstanding in this as the camera on the Pixel 5 or Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra in these types of shots.

This is the rear camera experience

Truth be told, unless we need a shot about 2 centimeters from the product, and since we stick with the full-scale camera that it gets, a close-up shot with the primary camera will consistently give a more excellent photograph than a rigorously large-scale one.

The clarification: Apple, as in cases such as OnePlus or ASUS (equally with great results in the primary case), uses the wide-point camera for this type of shots and, later, as a reinforcement there is a huge sensor and with proper aim.

Consequently, it is quite possible that for our situation resorting to large-scale shooting is something related, however, essentially the framework supports it, and it is a methodology "on the big side" like OnePlus. Obviously the app is fully programmed and this can be irritating at times, assuming what we need is to come up with a large-scale shot with the primary.

While the main lens is an all-rounder, the wide-angle facial is this iPhone's stabilizer, as it isn't that great.

Towards the end of the day, the wide-angle focal point is this current iPhone's risk in case we see what doesn't compare to a bright enough day. We expected much better results especially at dusk and around night, circumstances in which the scene does not maintain the detail, patches of fog appear.

We must also consider that it is a camera that will consistently underexpose in general and will require more light than the main one to bring the result closer, also seeing a shading wash that becomes unmarked when trying to take a large-scale shot.

3x tends to zoom in on the scene while maintaining detail and, more importantly, not liking shading wash or white balance changes. At sunset time or in low light, we see that it does not work and that the main focal point with the cutout rises to the scene.

With this we see that in general it is going to feed the forms and that the photo can be excessively sensational and distorted, however, during the day with the TV it offers us quality possibilities and with an exceptionally sufficient colorimetry.

In general, we see that the best understanding of features and shadows falls on the main focal length, and that the wide angle focal point will be the one that can achieve the most additional differentiation. Here perhaps we can select one of the Styles, although we will always have the alternative of resorting to the manager.

Speaking of Styles, it is about the use of a readjustment that is innate to the photo. In other words, with a channel we dress the photo with a removable cape, with a Style we coordinate the limits in the DNA of the photo so that it communicates its thoughts, for example, with more splendor, more difference or a specific white balance.

It can also have a more recounted use, especially considering that its performance is to a certain extent less immediate than that of the channels (except if we have it reconfigured). In any case, we can physically change the impact, so we can apply it with practically no pretense.

In photo mode we do not see a perceptible change compared to the iPhone 12 Pro. Editing is normally acceptable and considers genuine shapes very well even with hair, although indoors and around night it has more problems and gives shocking and somewhat coarser crop photos.

IPhone 13 Pro front camera

The front camera of the iPhone has been giving somewhat less reasonable results in terms of white balance and cutting edge than the iPhone XS, with photographs that are hotter and closer to the fuchsia point, despite the fact that without losing subtlety (even at the time of the sunset).

In programmed day mode we have photos extremely delivered to reality in lighting, contrast, shading, white balance and immersion. This balance was absent in the selfies of Apple mobiles and, in this mode, they have fully recovered it. Also, we have ProRaw on the assumption that the raw document needs to be altered.

The images from this camera are something never seen before

In these conditions it is the point at which the image mode, in addition, yields more. We see that, depending on the base, the editing can be somewhat harsher than with the main camera, however, the closer view remains in the definition and the rest of the limits.

At dusk, all the cats are brown and all the photographs are slower and slower. The key will be in the lighting and in using or not the night and photography modes. The primary helps us save a photo in low light conditions, working on understanding the shadows and figuring out how to further characterize the image without oversizing the shapes.

The second can be a real debacle with indirect lighting or the main lights of the day: intrusion of the clamor and, usually, darkened photographs. Something astounding when contrasted with photographs in programmed mode in the same circumstance, when the lighting should not make it so problematic.

Video

The iPhone moves too smoothly in the recording. Both 4K and FullHD offer quality possibilities, compensated and with a great degree of detail in the case that we talk about ideal light conditions.

The accounts look very good either with HDR, although in this sense we should have a viable screen with this standard to see them well. We have recorded most of the recordings with this setting looking for the most incredibly complete option that the laptop presents, however, we still put some with HDR disabled.

The fit is a pleasure, especially during the day. Around the night we could see some shaking in FullHD (in ordinary mode). However, given the conditions and what for the most part we find in the current circumstance is not something striking. Obviously, although the jump from one focal point and then to the next is not overwhelming in terms of image, in the sound we will see that tele and wide-angle focal lengths have a more terrible uptake.

Fluency is maintained both at 60 fps and in other conditions. At sunset time we will see that the definition deficiency is more articulate and the shapes weaken, especially in the wide point, more or less your opinion as the result in photography indicates. The full scale mode is enhanced in video. Since it depends on the framework, invoking it can cost a bit and does not usually happen.

An artistic recording offered by the iPhone 13 Pro

The artistic mode is the genuine amazement and what is causing, clearly, a serious sensation in its delivery. It is an assumption of the picture mode that we have seen recently from Samsung and different manufacturers, however, with excellent treatment and significantly better at caring for the specific haze.

The framework recognizes creatures and individuals and preselects them for us so that we have it easier while we change the thing to zero. We can also hit the foundations or lifeless things regardless of whether we do not check them.

What we must take into account is lighting. Artistic mode is considerably more demanding than standard mode and will not work if the frame recognizes that the light is inadequate, which will occur in a night scene with false normal lighting.

In the front camera we also see a really firm photo exchange. With shots of up to 4K, by day it gives us impressive recordings in the degree of detail, colorimetry and white balance, however, at night the result has much to improve.

Autonomy: for once, guarantees satisfied

Apple spoke of an improvement in autonomy in this 13 Pro compared to the 12 Pro, explicitly 2.5 hours more. Something that would be achieved without having barely changed the volume (as we said in the part of the plan), and according to GSM Arena with a 3,095 mAh battery (contrasted with the 2,815 mAh of the 12 Pro ).

There are some new components to consider, beyond the battery, regarding the independence of this versatile:

· On the one hand, there is 120 Hz as the highest invigoration rate, however, on the other hand, there is the ProMotion setting.

· Another processor: all the more remarkable, however, in principle equally more efficient.

· Another operating system.

These are by no means the main perspectives that impact, however, considering how comparative the laptop is to the iPhone 12 Pro they are generally valid statements to examine the conceivable variety in independence.

Battery is much better than previous iPhone versions

The normal battery life is longer, in our experience around 25 hours, which is about 3 hours longer than what the iPhone 12 Pro gave us. The best thing about this is to see the subtleties, considering that our most extreme independence has been with 120 Hz started, which praises ProMotion, although the shortest independence has been additionally at 120 Hz. Obviously, we don't see an increase in screen hours.

Looking at charging, we can remember that the iPhone really excludes a charger, as different producers, for example, Samsung and Xiaomi have been doing on certain models. Since we had a MagSafe charger and a distinctive charger from Apple gadgets, we had the option to try a few perspectives:

· 5-volt charger: 3 hours and 15 minutes.

· 20-volt charger: 1 hour and 45 minutes.

· MagSafe remote charger: just under 3 hours.

The battery area in the general settings has not undergone significant changes, and we do not have more data than we found in the last adaptation of the frame, however, it is still fascinating to operate the improved charging alternative.

Sound: they double the paste, and well they have done

Apple is saved by a fairly often large run around here, so it's not hard not to remember a few weaknesses. The sound of the sound system indeed hails the gadget, as does Lightning as the main association of real headphones, along with the strong settings that (as we will see) are unmistakably, extremely close.

The sound that emerges from the iPhone 13 Pro's speakers is fresh, clear, and uniquely powerful. There is acceptable bass and treble payment and there is no observable distinction with the iPhone 12 Pro.

The sound quality is gigantic

At the volume level it is abundant, reaching in our tests up to 117 decibels in the fast performance of the primary speaker, which comes out at about 88 decibels encompassing (speaking of the most extreme volume).

The sound settings are still ready to modify the sounds and vibrations of the gadget and less to the additional elements that we see in numerous Android models in the degree of Dolby Audio or adjustment. Considering that the sound is top-notch we don't miss them, however there may be customers who do miss it.

Speaking of sound through headphones, the experience from now on improves as much as physical science favors listening due to setup. We have tested from a distance as from the Lightning and the sound seems to be adjusted and everything paid in the degree of dynamic range.

iPhone 13 Pro, evaluation

The iPhone 13 Pro is another proof that the notions are nothing more than that, extravagant convictions, and that the 13 has not acquired any misfortune for Apple in terms of its shipping and the experience that the versatile allows so far. It is a strong, highly manufactured and complete item.

The size, despite not being a bit portable, can be a help compared to what is generally seen today (even against the Pro Max itself ).

The cameras neglect to persuade the normal by those drawbacks that we have found in the wide point or night photography, despite the fact that it is remunerated with generally excellent results in video and in the fundamental camera. The new sensor and the "new" setting have been acceptable, currently the other remains to be cared for.

In short, without being a colossal update on its archetype, it is a decent phone that addresses the generally incredible of Apple for 2021. We will also check if this new true to life mode has the viral impact on the business that the iPhone 7's photo mode had. Plus at the time.